In a word: no. Yes, it's likely that lower echelons of the CIA and State Department were aware that Georgia intended to attack South Ossetia. But no, Bush didn't in any way give them "permission" to do so, and it is unlikely that his aides had any understanding of why the lower echelons were sending them this information about some place they'd never heard of. Saying that Bush somehow gave Georgia "permission" to invade South Ossetia ascribes far too much competence to George W. Bush and the people around him.
In the end, George W. Bush is a tool of ideologues who have as their goal the destruction of the United States Government, which they feel is too much an impairment to their ability to make profits off of the suffering of other people. He is not a Putin or even a Medvedev who controls the machinery of state, Bush doesn't control even what he has for breakfast. Anyhow, one of the side effects of this is that the competence of major arms of the U.S. government has been destroyed by driving out competent people and replacing them with incompetents who can then be used as an excuse to dismantle portions of the U.S. government. An example is the U.S. Secretary of State, who as National Security Advisor was warned that al Qaeda was about to strike inside the United States by hijacking airliners and, rather than issue a directive to the domestic law enforcement services to be on the lookout for al Qaeda operatives trying to hijack airliners, instead feebly asked the people at the meeting where she was warned to gather more information. As her reward for incompetence she was made Secretary of State. That is the sort of incompetent person that is appointed to positions in the U.S. government today. Even if the CIA advisors in Georgia noticed the preparations to invade Ossetia, there was literally nobody competent in the U.S. government that they could communicate that to, all the competent people have been fired or pushed out into retirement as part of the plan to destroy the U.S. government...
So in any event, the notion that the U.S. somehow "allowed" Georgia to do this does not pass the laugh test to those of us who have viewed with dismay the dismantling of major portions of the U.S. government over the past seven years. Most of the upper echelons of the U.S. government are no longer competent to walk and chew gum at the same time, much less evaluate urgent notices from CIA operatives overseas... and these people have nuclear weapons. That is scary. Very scary.
I notice that people outside the United States ascribe more competence to the U.S. government than it deserves. I suspect that this happened to the Georgians -- they got mixed signals from the morons at the U.S. State Department and decided that this was a deliberate action on the part of the U.S. government to say that the U.S. would back them if they took action without actually saying so. Sad for all the dead Georgians and Ossetians, this ascribing of competence to the U.S. government was utterly wrong. The U.S. government is a bunch of morons with nuclear weapons, and should be depended upon for nothing more than invading the wrong country (the only country in the Middle East that did *not* contribute to the WTC destruction) and sending aid to "democracies" that boil and skin alive their own people.
-- Badtux the Geopolitical Penguin
Tux, I think it's creepier and scarier than a bunch of incompetents. Were you aware of the 1,000 U.S. troops who were sent to Georgia just before this invasion? Are they still there? I haven't seen any mention of this exercise, or its outcome, in the MSM. I've seen rumours of Israeli advisors, too, but no substance.
ReplyDeletet's part of a calculated geopolitical game, IMHO, where the U.S. keeps pushing, pushing, pushing, to see how far they can go before there's push-back. Now they know. Too bad there's so many dead Georgians and Ossetians and a few Russians as a result of the game.
Consider other ramifications. Georgia was pushing to be part of NATO. What if it had been? Then NATO would have been dragged in. What does this show Europe about the way Russia will deal with disputes on the Continent? Instead of using money musclepower, as the Chinese do (that's how wars will be fought in the 21st Century) Russia is doing it the 20th Century high-explosive way. How old-fashioned...
Then there's the response of Bush (a figurehead posing as a leader) vs. Putin (a leader posing as a figurehead.) Which one stayed at the Olympics with his finger up his nose, and which flew back to direct the action? When I think of who wields power in the U.S., I don't think of Bush, I think of Cheney and the fascists in the shadows. They're not incompetent; they're skilled at what matters to them -- stealing and killing.
Oh, it's so interesting to see this playing out, as long as I'm at a safe distance in a land that matters not the least to the rest of the world...