Wednesday, April 20, 2005

Institutions are better than loving homes

The State of Texas, faced with a shortage of loving foster homes, has taken steps to resolve that shortage -- by protecting these children from homosexual and bisexual foster parents. After all, it is better that these children live in institutions than living with someone who, like, BANGS THE WRONG SEX. After all, if they bang the wrong sex, what else might they do? Eat quiche? Admire French cuisine? VOTE DEMOCRAT?! No no, it is far better that we keep these children in sterile institutional settings than to submit them to the horrors of a loving home. After all, no child ever suffered from being raised in an institution rather than in a loving home!

- Badtux the Snarky Penguin

5 comments:

  1. Hmm, I appear to be bloggered. I have a mirror set up at http://www.badtux.net in case I can't get blogspot to start responding again :-(.

    - Badtux the Anonymous Penguin

    ReplyDelete
  2. I heard about this. They said it was to "protect children". From what? Exposure to caring people?

    And who do they think they're fooling when they say that stuff? Maybe the people in Texas are stupid enough to believe them. After all, they elected Dubya governor. But the rest of America...never mind. Half of America is exactly that stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The juish-christian position:
    Texas Oil companies care feed and cloth children.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------

    The rest of the world thinks:

    U.S.-Americans = kidkillers.

    During WWI & WWII in Europe.
    During the Vietnam Engagment.
    With B-52 bombers in Lybia
    With 9000 KG-bombs in Persia.(now:Afghanistan)
    With economical sanctions in so-called Irak.

    ReplyDelete

Ground rules: Comments that consist solely of insults, fact-free talking points, are off-topic, or simply spam the same argument over and over will be deleted. The penguin is the only one allowed to be an ass here. All viewpoints, however, are welcomed, even if I disagree vehemently with you.

WARNING: You are entitled to create your own arguments, but you are NOT entitled to create your own facts. If you spew scientific denialism, or insist that the sky is purple, or otherwise insist that your made-up universe of pink unicorns and cotton candy trees is "real", well -- expect the banhammer.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.