Monday, March 19, 2007

On war

You cannot qualify war in harsher terms than I will. War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; and those who brought war into our country deserve all the curses and maledictions a people can pour out. ... You might as well appeal against the thunder-storm as against these terrible hardships of war. They are inevitable, and the only way the people [...] can hope once more to live in peace and quiet at home, is to stop the war, which can only be done by admitting that it began in error and is perpetuated in pride.

-- William Tecumseh Sherman, 1864

At 9:30pm EST on March 19, 2003, the first bombs dropped on Baghdad, part of a massive bombing campaign that coincided with a military campaign to disarm Saddam's weapons of mass destruction prevent Saddam from harboring al Qaeda terrorists liberate Iraqis like these very well liberated Iraqis:

Before the inevitable objections "but we didn't *intend* to kill little girls!", bullshit. When you choose to go to war, you choose to kill little girls. Period. To quote a man who knew war, "War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it". If you intend to go to war, you intend to kill little girls. Period. If you are not willing to kill little girls, then you are not willing to go to war. Those who chose to go to war -- which was some 65% of the American population in 2003 -- implicitly chose to kill little girls. They might claim that this is not what they chose, but they lie. You might as well appeal against the thunder-storm as against these terrible hardships of war. They are inevitable. Choose war, and you choose to kill little girls.

Four years later, little girls are still dying. As are American soldiers, but they are a tiny, tiny tiny percentage of the dead. Over 650,000 Iraqis have died over the past four years -- or more Iraqis than Saddam managed to kill in his entire 25 year reign. As a people we Americans focus on the dead American soldiers only because we are an ignorant, self-interested people who view anybody who is not American as untermenschen, inhuman, just two-legged cockroaches to be exterminated like vermin. As a people we are cruel and heartless towards anybody who isn't part of our own little enclave of hairless monkeys with delusions of grandeur. We are maliciously vindictive towards anybody who points out that we're just monkeys and no better than any other monkeys on this planet and that we're being cruel and vicious. And little girls still die. And little girls still die.

How many little girls will die before our leaders stop the war, which can only be done by admitting that it began in error and is perpetuated in pride? How many little girls must die before the piteous mewling of self-interest politicians more interested in political gamesmanship and bullshit do what's right instead of what's expedient? How many? And for what purpose?

"Freedom isn't free," the wingnuts cry. But it seems to me that it is the Iraqi people who are paying the price, especially the 50% of the Iraqi population that is below the age of 18. They are dying by the hundreds of thousands. They are paying the price. How dare we say that we should choose their deaths? Should not the price of freedom be one that the Iraqis themselves decide for themselves? But I forget, they are mere untermenchen, mud people, just filthy cockroaches. They cannot liberate themselves. They need fine white ubermenschen American GI's to do that.

And so they die. And so they die. For no purpose that anybody can tell me. Stop civil war? It's happening. Stop al Qaeda from setting up in Iraq? They're there. Stop ethnic cleansing? It's happening. Prevent a refugee crisis? It's happening. Even the "war for oil" reason, in the end, fails. There is no oil in Baghdad. Yet our soldiers fight and kill and die in Baghdad. For what reason, other than for the sake of ignorance and pride? How many more young girls must die, before we admit that the war was begun in error and perpetuated in pride, and bring the soldiers home?

The answer, sadly, is too many. Far too many. And the answer of the wingnuts is... clap louder. Ah yes. Clap louder. But this penguin, for one, is tired of clapping.

- Badtux the War Penguin

5 comments:

  1. Let us not forget the millions of Iraqi refugees (that we will not allow in this country). They are also victims of this war.

    Oh... My bad... Not "refugees;" they were liberated from their homes and homeland.

    Mixter

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, "liberated". Oh how so very, very "liberated".

    - Badtux the un-liberated Penguin
    (until the MIB's knock on my door anyhow).

    ReplyDelete
  3. Some people wonder why we are in Iraq.I’d like to think that the reason why we are in these places is because of the rest of the world’s indifference. With that being said I have a little information that may help you understand that we went to Iraq to rid the world and the middle east of a dictator and a mass murderer. According to Harry Hayes of the International Review, on the 16th of March, 1988 Sadaam Hussein ordered a chemical attack on the Kurdish People of Halabja, Iraq. In this attack, which was supposedly documented with much enthusiasm, the people of Halabja suffered the maiming of 16,000 people. Of that 16,000 people 5,000 were killed. This, to me is a grim reminder as to why we are doing what we are doing. So to all that do not support the troops, Look up the photographs from "Bloody Friday"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Let's see -- Saddam, according to Human Rights Watch, killed about 100,000 Iraqis during the course of his 20 year rule.

    The United States has killed *at least* that number of Iraqis during the current occupation of Iraq, which has thus far lasted 1/4th as long.

    In both cases, the Iraqis killed are Iraqis who oppose the government. It's just that in one case the government was Saddam's government, and in the other case the government is the U.S. government. The biggest difference is that if you didn't oppose Saddam's government, you weren't killed. The U.S. military, on the other hand, has this bad habit of bombing a city block flat, civilians and all, if a single sniper is shooting out of one of the buildings at U.S. troops. Not that I can blame our troops for that. They didn't ask to get sent to this fetid sand-pit and get shot at, and are just trying to get out alive. But those civilians are dead just the same.

    Conclusion: The U.S. is *at least* four times better at killing Iraqis than Saddam was. But the dead Iraqis are damn well liberated, yessiree. Maybe not the kinda liberation they want or appreciate, given that, well, they're *dead*, but they sure are damn well liberated! And that's not even counting the 4,000,000 Iraqis who are now homeless, living in refugee camps or tent cities or in Jordan or Syria... boy, I'm sure they're happy, they've been liberated out of their homes, their livelihoods... what ingrates, to resent their liberation from their earthly possessions!

    Yesirree, liberation. Why do those pesky Iraqis seem so... ungrateful... to get this kinda liberation?!

    - Badtux the Snarky Penguin

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey, just wanted to give you head's up that I linked to this bit on my most recent post. I found you while doing an image search. Great stuff.

    Best,

    Juliet

    ReplyDelete

Ground rules: Comments that consist solely of insults, fact-free talking points, are off-topic, or simply spam the same argument over and over will be deleted. The penguin is the only one allowed to be an ass here. All viewpoints, however, are welcomed, even if I disagree vehemently with you.

WARNING: You are entitled to create your own arguments, but you are NOT entitled to create your own facts. If you spew scientific denialism, or insist that the sky is purple, or otherwise insist that your made-up universe of pink unicorns and cotton candy trees is "real", well -- expect the banhammer.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.