In a time of chimpanzees, I was a penguin.
The religious right is motivated by the suspicion that someone, somewhere,
is having fun -- and that this must be stopped.
Republican Senatorial candidate Carly Fiorina is either a crook, or clueless. That's the best you can say about her supposed non-knowledge of an extensive bribery campaign conducted in Russia, a campaign that included a large number of shell companies owned by HP. Either she's the Sgt. Shultz of CEO's -- "I see no-think! I hear no-think!" -- or she's Richard Nixon reincarnate. Either way, why would any sensible person vote for her to be a U.S. Senator?
-- Badtux the Corruption-sniffin' Penguin
Ground rules: Comments that consist solely of insults, fact-free talking points, are off-topic, or simply spam the same argument over and over will be deleted. The penguin is the only one allowed to be an ass here. All viewpoints, however, are welcomed, even if I disagree vehemently with you.
WARNING: You are entitled to create your own arguments, but you are NOT entitled to create your own facts. If you spew scientific denialism, or insist that the sky is purple, or otherwise insist that your made-up universe of pink unicorns and cotton candy trees is "real", well -- expect the banhammer.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Simple fact - she's a crook. Exhbiit A: she was a corporate CEO.
ReplyDeleteSensible people will N
OT vote for her. But she might get elected by Republicans.
JzB
Carly was fired from her CEO job at HP. She has lied and been caught so many times that's she's a shoe in to be the candidate of Republicans.
ReplyDeleteFrom what I remember she was even thrown off the McCain campaign for gross lies. Hell she should run for President, the baggers will love her.
Gawd, Palan,Bachmann, and Fiorina.
The trilogy of terror.....
You could say the same thing about Romney. The only question is, will fellow Republicunts, or even Dimwittocrats, attack her (and Mittens) for being heartless bastards who profited by shipping American jobs to China? Or will that be too confronting a tactic to sit well with the corporate masters of both parties?
ReplyDelete