So the Afghan government says "your bombs killed 70 civilians when you bombed one of our villages" and the U.S. Army says "no, we only killed seven civilians, everybody else was a terrorist." Only problem is, this is the 21st century. Everybody has a cell phone. And almost all of these cell phones have the ability to make movies. There's video of the bodies of 11 dead children laid out in the village square in the aftermath of the bombing. I guess four of those dead children were actually terrorists, whoa, beware the baby rattles of mass destruction!
Actually, the problem is that you have soldiers doing the job of policemen in the first place. The job of a soldier is to kill people, and to kill them with as little loss to his own side as possible. Overwhelming force is, and always has been, the way to do that. That's a soldier's job -- making people die. Asking a soldier to be a policeman is like asking a pit bull to be a babysitter. The results are simply tragic.
Think about that in the context of having soldiers do jobs like, e.g., border enforcement. The inevitable result of that would be a lot of dead civilians. I simply do not understand why it is that people think a soldier is a policeman and can do a policeman's job. I suppose it's a steady diet of war movies growing up where soldiers are honorable and only kill the enemy, not civilians. But those are movies. Fiction. Lies. Not real. Sadly, today nobody knows the difference between their delusions and reality, because they're buried in lies so much...
- Badtux the Fictional Penguin


