Even more important is the *political* results of this happening. We already know what happened in Germany and Italy when things hit bottom. It almost happened here too, and the only reason it didn't was because there was still a strain of progressivism extant whose credibility had not yet been completely demolished by Republican chants of "government is the problem, not the solution". That is no longer true here today. Our modern-day Father Coughlans are much more widespread and much more powerful than they were then, not to mention that we don't have a progressive equivalent to FDR (who was a very ruthless man with no compunctions about silencing opponents) today to keep our modern-day Father Coughlans from backing a fascist take-over of the government. When people are desperate, they will cling to anybody who offers hope. When the system has been systematically degraded and its credibility destroyed over the past thirty years by Republican action, the chances that this hope will arise outside the system and end up like Germany/Italy in the 1930's is far greater than I like.
Anyhow, that's why I say that avoiding a deflationary spiral has to be the #1 thing we do here. Yes, the currency was inflated with bogus financial instruments. Yes, this means we're going to have to take the politically risky step of swapping those bogus financial instruments for treasuries in order to prevent deflation from setting in and collapsing the system. But it has to be done or we risk a deflationary spiral and its very unpleasant aftermath. The problem I have is that the administration's proposal appears to be a license to loot, not that it pretty much trades bogus financial instruments for treasuries.
-- Badtux the Economics Penguin
No comments:
Post a Comment
Ground rules: Comments that consist solely of insults, fact-free talking points, are off-topic, or simply spam the same argument over and over will be deleted. The penguin is the only one allowed to be an ass here. All viewpoints, however, are welcomed, even if I disagree vehemently with you.
WARNING: You are entitled to create your own arguments, but you are NOT entitled to create your own facts. If you spew scientific denialism, or insist that the sky is purple, or otherwise insist that your made-up universe of pink unicorns and cotton candy trees is "real", well -- expect the banhammer.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.